In the wake of brutal police murders of young Black men, a popular resistance began to form. This movement was known as “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) Officially according to the organization it began in July 2013 after the acquittal of George Zimmerman for the killing of Trayvon Martin. In June of this year I said that the movement was nearing its end; and that it had only a few months left to it. This appears to be the case now. The movement is on its last legs, the steam it came on with has blown itself out.
Don’t mistake my words here for some kind of celebration. Most leftist groups in the U.S. are still in denial over the movement’s fate. What was once a loud and proud resistance has become little more than a part of the “cuck” jokes about Bernie Sanders. What was once a declaration of war against oppressors has become little more than the obnoxious behaviour of a few self-involved individuals.
So what happened? Essentially what I predicted would happen: liberals took over the movement. It was born out of a radical need to fight killings by police. A real physical defense against police oppression was being organized. Truly radical ideas like self-defense forces were being organized. Unfortunately the mass of the movement are liberals, not radicals. The majority of Black people in America aren’t leftist radicals, they’re liberals who vote Democrat. BLM is made up of liberals with a few radical elements around the fringes. These fringe radical elements are the exception, not the rule.
I said that liberals were going to overtake the movement and co-opt it. Once that took place the movement was sabotaged. Liberals are not interested in radical change, they’re interested in getting concessions. Radical elements were deliberately purged from the movement. This is what the Austin chapter of BLM did:
That’s a consideration that’s come into question since news broke that the city would host three discordant rallies at the same time this Saturday morning. Members of the 1312 Project did not respond to calls from the Chronicle, but Margaret Haule, who spoke on behalf of Black Lives Matter, quickly made it known that her organization is “not to be confused” with the 1312 Project. “We don’t do things that are considered illegal,” she explained. “We’re not trying to get a bad rap. We’re more transparent and open. It’s important that people see there are people playing an active role in the community.”
Essentially the 1312 Project opposed (and rightfully so) the Police Lives Matter (PLM) movement. However, the BLM wanted to support the PLM. This collaboration is with Police Chief Art Acevedo:
Acevedo said he spoke with members of Black Lives Matter about national and local policy changes they want implemented to ensure equality, and added he agrees with the majority of them. He also said what the group would like to see in regards to police relations is only a small part of the entire movement.
“All they want is to have police officers that are respectful, that treat people as part of the community and don’ treat them like they’re an occupying army and we get that,” Acevedo said.
This act is an outright collaboration with the enemy. The 1312 Project was purged from BLM because it had a radical agenda that challenged the police. There were not without comment on the matter:
On Monday morning, Sept. 14, an anonymous member of the anti-police-brutality activist group the 1312 Project – shorthand for “All Cops Are Bastards” – posted a message on Facebook announcing a change of plans. This Saturday, Sept. 19, the group will send its membership to rally at the Capitol rather than APD headquarters. “It appears as though some organizers’ desire to control this movement has resulted in, at best, police collaboration and, at worst, the active selling out of other organizers,” read the note. “We see this as a breach in camaraderie that puts those of us who were planning on meeting at APD headquarters in far more danger.” The seven-paragraph message concluded with an edict: “Fuck the cops, fuck politicians, and stay savvy,” it read.
The fact is in the first world the more successful you are, the more you’ll be co-opted. At this point BLM is an empty shadow of what it was intended to be. The mainstream media and political establishment aren’t even opposed to it. News networks are now using terms like ‘white privilege’ and going over the recent history of police violence. Politicians are voluntarily meeting with the group, including presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. If the establishment doesn’t see it as a threat, you’re not challenging the system.
Why did this happen? Long story short: there is no social base for revolution in the first world. Radicals begin resistance groups to challenge the power of an unjust system. The problem is that the masses of the American people don’t want to do revolution. Often they face very oppressive conditions, such as the police killings of young Black people. However, they have no desire to overthrow the system which causes that oppression. They only wish to have that oppression stop. There is no social base for these radical groups to lead. There are only liberal Democrat Party supporting reformers. The liberals co-opt these radical movements because there isn’t any significant number of radicals to follow them.
The truth radical groups are not accepting, is that Black people in America don’t want a civil war to bring about a whole new society. All they really want is the same wealth and privileges that White people have. Radical groups however, continue to pull quotes from the 1960s Black Panthers and act as though we still exist in those times. Just because radicals want to take radical action, does not mean that the mass of Blacks in America want to take radical action themselves.
There definitely needs to be a coordinated radical action against the racist U.S. police state. Unfortunately there isn’t the social base, nor the organization for such a thing to happen.
4 thoughts on “The Reality of the Black Lives Matter Movement”
this would make a good video too. I think if you make one on this topic, you should add facts about how black people in amerika are totally consumerist. hip hop culture is almost entirely manufactured by white producers and sold to black kids so they’ll buy more stuff and forget about their struggles as blacks. black people care more about white people stealing cornrows than they do about their history.
do you think they can ever become radicalized enough to overthrow the ruling class or do you think they’re a lost cause like all other 1st worlders? also do you consider black people in amerika to be 1st world or not?
I definitely think blacks can get radicalized enough to at least resist the status quo. They and the natives are the only ones (and some immigrants) have potential as far as their material conditions are worst off than their white counterparts, and actually joblessness in places like baltimore is even actually comparable to some African third world areas like Nigeria. What I think Jason is saying is even the most radical elements in first world society is easily brush to the side by liberalism cause the masses in America are not revolutionary. As far as the masses of blacks just wanting equality, and not revolution that may be true, but I will also include the major collective historical philosophical consciousness of blacks in America and unfortunately it is the turn the other cheek philosophy like great leaders in our community like Martin Luther King Jr for me that has had profound effect on blacks when dealing with their social issues. Don’t get me wrong I have nothing but respect for Martin Luther King Jr, but this is the effect that non cooperative non-violent approach produces. This kind of teaching has been past on from decades and its instill in many politically active African Americans today. I think if a more radicalized Malcolm X with theoretical backings in at least towards resistance rather than revolution (cause we all agree that you can’t be revolutionary in a society where the primary material condition for revolution in that society is not there) It can develop a form of consciousness for at least resistance. I see blacks in Amerikkka as oppress but like many oppress people undeveloped conscious with many factors as the reason why. According to Marx, that is suppose to be the job of the Communist to integrate those unique struggle among people into class consciousness.
no only young black men, but also young black women
its not just young black man that have been recently killed b y police
its also black girls
Comments are closed.